Neenah Exact Vellum Bristol, 8.5" x 11", 67 lb/147 gsm, White, 94 Brightness, 250 Sheets (80211)

I had to get used to the texture. I use it to print coloring book pages for Adult Coloring. It goes through my HP Envy 6000 printer with no problem. I intend to buy it again.

Lovely paper! I bought to print coloring pages. I'm anxious to try this paper.

This is a very high quality paper that I'm glad I discovered. I usually do not use this paper through a printer, although I have used it with a color ink-jet printer and a laser printer and the results are excellent. My primary use of this paper is for journaling with different types of calligraphy pens and/or pencil sketching. I used to be a big fan of Moleskine notebooks, but for my style of putting ideas to paper, I ditched the standard codex journal and ordered a brick of paper and an archival box - this Vellum Bristol paper was what I chose after looking at many options and it is great for me. I still do like Moleskine products; however, a codex works with centralised topics - e.g., in graduate school, each class I took had its own Moleskine for notes because I knew I would want to look back at those notes in the future & that Moleskine is high in quality. Taking up journaling, I went to Moleskine, but noticed I was leaving blank pages every so often to accommodate subject changes and it turned into a giant jumbled up mess. So now I grab a clipboard, a sheet of this Vellum Bristol and have at it. Whatever idea I have gets down on paper and later I go through and organize what would otherwise be a giant morass of writing with the occasional drawing thrown in. So for printing documents, this might be overkill, but you'll get a nice end product. It is a lighter type of cardstock I suppose; but I see it's value for something much different than use through a printer. It's hard to think of what I would print on it, as it's not what I would call cardstock and it's way too fancy/thick for article writing/submission. But the possibilities are vast. I find the product to be of great value, others may find issue with it depending on need.

It’s something I didn’t know existed: lighter than cardstock, heavier than standard printer/copier paper. I was using pre-perforated business card stock to print labels for products I sell, using a printer that doesn’t have a single-sheet feed slot. I filled the alternate tray with it, easy-peasy, and it worked - until warmer weather arrived. The added humidity was causing the cardstock to consistently get jammed nearly every time. It was very frustrating. So I poked around to see what alternatives existed, and this fit the bill. Never jams, and is thick enough to allow double-sided inkjet printing without bleed-through. OK, so I have to trim it manually, but that beats dealing with paper jams (especially since I use a guillotine cutter with laser guide)! The paper feels a little like some of my parchment stock, but has the clean appearance of fine resume paper. If you need something that works reliably even in warm weather, is a cut above regular copier paper and can be printed double-sided without issues, this is a fine choice.

This cardstock is perfect for my printing needs. It does NOT have a smooth surface. Unlike slick, glossy cardstocks, it has a lightly textured, semi-smooth surface with "peaks and valleys". This makes it versatile for a variety of projects, offering a few specific advantages. The cardstock dries quickly and manipulates well to make the covers for my books and tablets that I make. Highly recommend this paper for those needs.

I'm an artist who generally uses art-quality bristol paper to do my work. I wanted bristol paper that didn't come in a glued/spiral-bound pad, so that I could do my sketches and layout on the computer and print it out in light blue. Then I do my inking, scan it back in, and edit out the blue lines on the computer. That gives me traditional linework and effects with the positioning power of digital sketching, composition, and layout. This works just fine for my purposes. It's not quite as high-quality as the bristol I generally use for inks, but it takes ink well. The inkjet color doesn't bleed on it when India inks and other media are added. The surface is smooth, like what I'm used to on thicker Bristol pads. It also makes a great practice surface (and is priced correctly for art practice). I figure my use of this is a little more specific than "greeting cards and photo printing," so I thought I'd share my experience. It's decent art paper, and I can't argue with the price. It is much thinner than traditional artist bristol, and a little more flimsy than traditional cardstock, so keep that in mind too. It's definitely thicker than regular printer paper...about twice as firm as tough construction paper. Again, just what I needed for the job, regardless. I think if I wanted the toughness of cardstock, I'd look for actual cardstock that could really support some weight. But for printing somewhere between printer paper and cardstock, it's a great value.

I've been working on a project that's demanded a lot from my paper (prototyping a new card game), so I thought I'd share what I've learned here: Firstly, the "weight" ratings on paper are incredibly confusing and misleading. There's a dozen different ways to measure weight, things like "cover, index bristol, bristol and tag", etc - so you can pretty much ignore the manufacturer's rating as a reliable indication of which paper is thicker / by how much. In prototyping the card game , we purchased this paper, as well as some by Wausau - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000ETXY78/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B000ETXY78&linkCode=as2&tag=allofthetech-20&linkId=PSQ4523DO2KELRFI Even though the rated weight of the Wasau paper was significantly higher (110 vs 67), we could barely tell the difference in hand. The only reliable way we could tell the difference was that this paper had a rougher texture - so that should be your primary decision point, not how much heavier one claims to be compared to the other's claim. Of course, since this paper is a third the cost, unless you /really/ want smoother paper, I'd recommend going with this paper. I hope you found this helpful! UPDATE: As an added bonus, I recently reviewed several paper cutters and figured that people purchasing card stock might also want to cut it. I found two good options: The $40 Swignline (whose price seems to swing quite a bit) - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00006IATH/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00006IATH&linkCode=as2&tag=allofthetech-20&linkId=SV5NFNPKIHFFOBRF And the $110 Amzdeal (who is regularly used by small print shops) - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CI02DSM/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00CI02DSM&linkCode=as2&tag=allofthetech-20&linkId=63BWPYOBKAPWQAM6 If you need the cheapest cutter possible, the Swingline works. It's a little better and a little faster than using scissors, but we found that it was only able to cut about three sheets of cardstock at once, and the lack of clamping meant that longer cuts would drift by up to 1/16th. No good if you're trying to do precision work! When we bought the Swingline, we managed to catch it at one of its low swings, when it was only $26. At $40, the $110 Amzdeal becomes a much better value - we're returning our Swingline and sticking with the Amzdeal. It's a much sturdier machine (the Swingline, made of plastic, actually flexes when you cut). If also provides much better measurement and clamping options, so we're able to get the exact same cut, with no drift, every time. Not only that, this machine is capable of cutting DOZENS of sheets of cardstock, compared to the Swingline's three.

I read some reviews and did some research. I’m using this for acrylic markers and alcohol markers. Seems to work pretty well. I can also print a sketch on the paper which is super nice. I’m very happy with this purchase.

Neenah es muy buena marca y el papel Bristol Vellum tiene un acabado muy bonito al tacto, es grueso como una cartulina pero más poroso entonces queda con textura muy bonita para etiquetas o regalos. Existe una versión de este mismo papel Neenah pero autoadherible, que era lo que yo buscaba originalmente para hacer botellas de vino y cerveza artesanal. Pero en México cada hoja es carísima, costaba como 24 pesos y de ahí me salen como 4 etiquetas, entonces 6 pesos la etiqueta sin contar lo que te salga por la tinta. En su lugar, opté por un block de este papel y yo pego las etiquetas manualmente con una mezcla ligera de engrudo, muy ecológico y barato. No es lo más rápido pero mientras no tengas que etiquetar cientas de botellas, funciona. Así que en lugar de 6 pesos por etiqueta, realmente son centavos :)

Why did you choose this product over others?: 1. Very nice quality paper. 2. I like the American Letter sized paper much better than A4 as the proportions are more aesthetically pleasing. 3. Very economical price and a good sized pack. 4. It goes through my printer.

Great paper for card making and prints well.

Ich habe das Papier geholt, um Ausmalseiten darauf zu drucken und auszumalen. Das Negative vorweg: Zu irgendeinem Zeitpunkt, bevor das Papier bei mir ankam, wurde die Verpackung beschädigt. Sie war zum Glück nicht komplett aufgerissen, so das keine Seiten fehlen. Allerdings waren 2 Blätter beschädigt - ich kann sie daher zumindest nicht wie geplant bedrucken. Doch nun zum Papier: Das Papier ist weiß, 147 g/m² schwer, US Letter size und mit Tintenstrahl- und Laserdrucker bedruckbar. Zumindest beim Laserdrucker lässt sich ein schönes Druckbild erzielen. Das Papier ist rau genug, um sich toll mit Buntstiften bemalen zu lassen.

Not the heaviest but definitely not a light paper. Brightness is good, but not an ultimate white tone. Really like this thickness, quite practical for quality drawing while not too thick not to be able to clip/cut.